|Title||Documenting Performance Metrics in a Building Life-Cycle Information System|
|Publication Type||Conference Paper|
|Year of Publication||1998|
|Authors||Robert J Hitchcock, Mary Ann Piette, Stephen E Selkowitz|
|Conference Name||1998 Green Building Challenge Conference|
|Conference Location||Vancouver, Canada|
In order to produce a new generation of green buildings, it will be necessary to clearly identify their performance requirements, and to assure that these requirements are met. A long-term goal of our program is to provide building decision-makers with the information and tools needed to cost-effectively assure the desired performance of buildings, as specified by stakeholders, across the complete life cycle of a building project. A key element required in achieving this goal is a method for explicitly documenting the building performance objectives that are of importance to stakeholders. Such a method should clearly define each objective (e.g., cost, energy use, and comfort) and its desired level of performance. This information is intended to provide quantitative benchmarks useful in evaluating alternative design solutions, commissioning the newly constructed building, and tracking and maintaining the actual performance of the occupied building over time.We refer to these quantitative benchmarks as performance metrics, and they are a principal element of information captured in the Building Life-cycle Information SyStem (BLISS) [Hitchcock, et al., 1997]. Metrics can be flexibly defined within the BLISS framework for a wide spectrum of objectives that building process participants wish to specify and track. In addition to performance metrics, BLISS contains a standardized data model that captures a detailed description of the building designed to achieve the specified objectives. This information is meant to be maintained and shared by building process participants across the complete life cycle of a building project. Participants will make use of the specific information within the overall data model that is relevant to the task at hand, such as design, commissioning, facility maintenance, and performance tracking.An initial implementation of BLISS is based on the International Alliance for Interoperability's (IAI) Industry Foundation Classes (IFC), an evolving data model under development by a variety of architectural, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry firms and organizations [IAI, 1997]. Within BLISS, the IFC data model has been extended to include performance metrics and a structure for archiving changing versions of the building information over time. This paper defines performance metrics, discusses the manner in which BLISS is envisioned to support a variety of activities related to assuring the desired performance of a building across its life cycle, and describes a performance metric tracking tool, called Metracker, that is based on BLISS.
|LBNL Report Number|| |