Sorry, wrong number: The use and misuse of numerical facts in analysis and media reporting of energy issues

Sorry, wrong number: The use and misuse of numerical facts in analysis and media reporting of energy issues

TitleSorry, wrong number: The use and misuse of numerical facts in analysis and media reporting of energy issues
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2002
AuthorsJonathan G Koomey, Chris Calwell, John A Laitner, Jane Thornton, Richard E Brown, Joseph H Eto, Carrie A Webber, Cathy Cullicott
Secondary AuthorsRobert H Socolow, Dennis Anderson, John Harte
JournalAnnual Review of Energy and the Environment 2002
Volume27
Pagination119-158
Date Published11/2002
Keywordselectricity reliability trends
Abstract

Students of public policy sometimes envision an idealized policy process where competent data collection and incisive analysis on both sides of a debate lead to reasoned judgments and sound decisions. Unfortunately, numbers that prove decisive in policy debates are not always carefully developed, credibly documented, or correct. This paper presents four widely cited examples of numbers in the energy field that are either misleading or wrong. It explores the origins of these numbers, how they missed the mark, and how they have been misused by both analysts and the media. In addition, it describes and uses a three-stage analytical process for evaluating such statistics that involves defining terms and boundaries, assessing underlying data, and critically analyzing arguments.

DOI10.1146/annurev.energy.27.122001.083458
LBNL Report Number

LBNL-50499